| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 swollenknuck |
Amateur classes on results |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 4 (06/29/09 21:36:40) |
I am sure this has already been discussed but I am just wondering why the CSAF results page does not have the ability to separate Amateurs into different
classes. I guess the question is whether it is a case of the website is not designed to handle it and is too hard to change or is it something that is not
wanted or felt needed.
Thank you Ray |
||
|
Big Daddy T Bone |
|||
|
Posts: 189 (06/30/09 03:53:13) |
I think it's in the not needed category right now. With 35 athletes listed, divisions seem unnecessary. And even with more athletes you can easily get an
idea of your immediate competition because it is, in fact, a list.
|
||
|
swollenknuck |
|||
|
Posts: 5 (06/30/09 06:21:43) |
Sorry, I guess I should have been more clear. I don't mean for the ranking page, I agree with you that there is no need to split it up. I am just referring
to the results page. For example it is hard to enter results for a games such as the BC Highland Games just past were we had Amateur A's, B's and
C's. The only option for entering in everyones results right now are to put them all in under Amateur but have three first places and three second places
and so on, which to me looks confusing.
Thanks Ray |
||
